Thursday, December 4, 2008

Detroit v. New York

Like everyone else, I was royally pissed to hear about the Big Three Execs flying to DC on private jets to beg for money for their failing companies. I am personally vested in GM because my mother, Mama T, works for the company as a laborer. Seeing these rich ass holes flaunting their wealth just proved to me the disgusting degree of the disconnect between the welfare of a company and that of the capitalists who own and run it. It almost seems as though they don't give a shit if their companies fail, because they will still be walking away with hundreds of millions in severance pay.

My mom has seen drastic cuts in insurance coverage, and her pension is now largely her own responsibility (without contribution from the company.) For instance, as a family (of two kids under 6, herself, and me) we are allowed three doctor appointments per year. I went to the doctor recently, thinking that it would be covered by insurance, and later received a bill for $150. The prescription I had was not covered either, and I had to pay $40 per refill.

Thus it feels criminal that GM CEO is enjoying unprecedented (in GM's history) compensation. Shouldn't he be taking cuts like our family has? No one would question his or his family's right to unlimited access to medical care. Hell, no one would question his right to at least five luxury homes, located across the globe in the most beautiful locales. I guess it's too much to ask for him to cut back, sell a couple of those mansions, for the sake of the whole. Instead, the poor folk that break their backs day after day will have to internalize the costs.

That being said, I was listening to NPR today when a story compared this scenario to that of the financial institutions. The reporter pointed out that the latter, New York companies, didn't have to do much work to receive bailout packages. Indeed, they were throwing lavish parties the day after with government monies. The Detroit companies are asking for fractions of the amount received by the New York companies, but the government has been reluctant to grant these funds. While it was outrageous that the CEOs flew in on private jets, and that they were unprepared for the meeting in Congress, why isn't the government rushing to their aid, as it did for the New York financial companies?

It should be said that the financial companies play a perhaps more important role in the functioning of the economy, by providing credit for other sectors. But can we really afford to let the Big Three go broke, especially when we consider the extent to which the Midwest relies on them for employment directly and via complimentary companies? I don't know what the solution is, but I am telling Mama T to start looking for some other employment options, because I definitely don't have room for everyone here in my little Columbus apartment :)

3 comments:

SW said...

I liken this to the "retreats" that the Wall Street execs went to after their bailout. It's a slap in the face to hard working people who are giving their tax dollars to keep things afloat...then they go have a massage and some mimosas. That's fucked up. I think Mama T deserves a massage and a mimosa. Let's hope Barack gets things turned around and we can get some uni healthcare soon...because I think we both will be needing it soon.

Tyler said...

girl amen to that

CCWA Youth Programs said...

I would like to know how the numbers compare for providing temporary, emergency relief (TANF) to heads of households who would be laid off versus providing corporate welfare in the form of this proposed bailout. From my perspective, I think this may be a good option (depending on the cost in relation to the bailout) because:
1. THose employees with transferable skills would be able to find employment elsewhere, therefore they would only need TANF very short term.
2. Those employees who are career-union folk with specific manufacturing skills would find work in an eventual new New deal, (receiving assistance via TANF in the meantime) and
3. Those auto companies which were floundering would be forced to bankruptcy, a status that would allow them to rethink their strategies, restructure, and compete.

Not all of the Big 3 are the same and should not be treated as if their problems all stem from the global economic catastrophe. Most were on the brink well before this...